Process/Memory usage multiple mappings compare to one [closed]

Question

Hello All,

  Is it "better" from a process/memory point of view to have one large mapping that does all MSH,EVN,PID,PD1, etc etc or is it better to have a MSH mapping to leads to a EVN mapping (and so on and so on).

   From a view and ease of maintenance point of view one mapping "type" (i.e. MSH/EVN/etc) per blue mapping node looks better and is more in terms of "object" design but I'm unsure of the performance hit.

 

   Can anyone answer?

Answer 1

From Qvera Support

With multiple mappings they get compiled down into one mapping anyhow, so if you have one large of 100 little there is no difference on processor or memory usage as the same code is executed eventually.